Opinion

Was Jesus Home­less, or a Refugee, or Finan­cial­ly Des­ti­tute? The Answer to All These Ques­tions Is No!

On Christ­mas Day in 2019, Pete Buttigieg, then may­or of South Bend, Indi­ana, tweet­ed out Christ­mas greet­ings. He said,

Today I join mil­lions around the world in cel­e­brat­ing the arrival of divin­i­ty on earth, who came into this world not in rich­es but in pover­ty, not as a cit­i­zen but as a refugee.

No mat­ter where or how we cel­e­brate, mer­ry Christ­mas.

https://twitter.com/PeteButtigieg/status/1209833386459750400?s=20&t=HlowKA4ttwklh-fZM9uXgQ

Streiff, a con­trib­u­tor at redstate.com, wasn’t buy­ing Buttigieg’s por­tray­al of the Sav­ior; nor did he hes­i­tate to call atten­tion to the dis­con­nect between the South Bend mayor’s lifestyle and bib­li­cal teach­ings. He wrote,

Buttigieg is one of those peo­ple who, despite liv­ing an immoral and dis­solute lifestyle explic­it­ly con­demned by Scrip­ture (that would be the pro­scrip­tion on homo­sex­u­al acts) and in direct dis­obe­di­ence to the words of Christ (see Matthew 19:4–6), takes it upon him­self to lec­ture every­one else about what it means to be a Chris­t­ian.

Unfor­tu­nate­ly, even some Chris­t­ian lead­ers seem now to be glee­ful­ly pro­mot­ing the ideas that Jesus was a refugee, home­less, and absolute­ly dirt poor. An arti­cle at hegetsus.com titled “Did Jesus live in pover­ty?” claims Jesus was home­less based on a pas­sage that quite like­ly doesn’t indi­cate this at all:

As we stud­ied the live of Jesus, we noticed a trend — Jesus dis­played immense empa­thy for the poor and the needy. But why? Then it struck us. Jesus was home­less him­self. He not­ed that birds had nests and fox­es had holes, but he didn’t have a place to rest his head each night. His life was one of sim­plic­i­ty and depri­va­tion.

Could there ever be a more effec­tive way to “human­ize Jesus” and to lead peo­ple to con­clude that He was “one of us” than to assert that He could iden­ti­fy with the least for­tu­nate among men because He also was home­less and owned noth­ing? This tugs at heart­strings and even even will give some peo­ple goose pim­ples. To real­ly under­stand who Jesus was, how­ev­er, we must think and study — not just feel.


To real­ly under­stand who Jesus was, we must think and study — not mere­ly feel.


While Jesus did say that “Fox­es have holes and birds of the air have nests, but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay His head,” this doesn’t mean He was home­less. In an arti­cle at evangelmagazine.com, Daniel Black dis­cuss­es the con­text of Jesus’ state­ment and high­lights the appar­ent motive behind the ques­tion that prompt­ed the Lord to say what He said about fox­es and birds.

Jesus’ state­ment was made to a man who vol­un­teered to fol­low Him (v. 57) in hopes of escap­ing from respon­si­bil­i­ty. Unlike fox­es and birds that with­draw to their dens and nests for rest, Jesus said there was no place for Him to rest from His respon­si­bil­i­ties. Jesus was on His last jour­ney to Jerusalem to be cru­ci­fied (v. 51), and He and His dis­ci­ples had just been refused hos­pi­tal­i­ty by a Samar­i­tan vil­lage (vv. 52–53). If this would-be dis­ci­ple want­ed to escape respon­si­bil­i­ty, Jesus want­ed him to know, he would not find that fol­low­ing Him.

Anoth­er writer makes this excel­lent point:

In the Hebrew Bible, refer­ring to “lay­ing one’s head down” usu­al­ly means being able to do so in peace, as in Psalm 23, Psalm 4:8, and the dif­fer­ent ani­mals lying down togeth­er in Isa­iah 11:6–7 and Hosea 2:18. Sleep­ing an untrou­bled sleep is a gift from God [see Ps. 127:2].…

Fox­es and birds to not live in their respec­tive shelters—it’s where they go to be safe.

This same writer also asserts that hav­ing to deal with the prob­lems of home­less­ness and abject pover­ty nev­er would afford a teacher the time nec­es­sary to engage in the type of min­istry Jesus con­duct­ed. His was a teach­ing and heal­ing min­istry to the mass­es that even­tu­al­ly gave way to a world­wide move­ment; and it includ­ed spend­ing qual­i­ty time with His apos­tles, the men who even­tu­al­ly would take the move­ment far beyond Pales­tine itself.

In fact, Jesus did have a place to stay, a home, dur­ing His min­istry. Matthew 4:13 tells us, “And leav­ing Nazareth, He came and dwelt in Caper­naum, which is by the sea, in the regions of Zebu­lun and Naph­tali.” Daniel Black cites numer­ous vers­es that refer to Jesus’ res­i­dence as “the house” — Matthew 9:28; 13:1, 36; Mark 2:1; 7:17; 9:28, 33; 10:10 — and then makes this obser­va­tion: “If I say to you, ‘I am going to the house,’ you know I mean the house I live in—my res­i­dence.”

Not Des­ti­tute

Jesus’ father was a car­pen­ter, and Jesus Him­self became one as well; so pro­duc­tive work was famil­iar to both this earth­ly father and His adopt­ed son. There is no indi­ca­tion this fam­i­ly was des­ti­tute, although they like­ly were not wealthy. Yes, it is true that when Mary and Joseph brought the sac­ri­fice for Mary’s purifi­ca­tion just over a month after Jesus had been born (see Luke 2:22–24), they offered two tur­tle­doves rather than a lamb (see Ex. 13:2; Lev. 12:1–8). It is rea­son­able to assume they couldn’t afford to offer a lamb, at least at that point. Even so, the fam­i­ly wasn’t home­less. When the wise men arrived to wor­ship Jesus as a child, prob­a­bly with­in a year or two after He was born, they came “into the house [where] they saw the young Child with Mary His moth­er, and fell down and wor­shiped Him.”

Nor was Jesus a refugee. He was born in a sta­ble because, after trav­el­ing to Beth­le­hem from Nazareth to take part in the Roman cen­sus, the crowd­ed town offered “no room” for Mary and Joseph, even though Mary would indeed give birth right then and there. Streiff notes that

Joseph and Mary and Jesus were cit­i­zens of a province of the Roman Empire. When the Mas­sacre of Inno­cents took place, they fled to Egypt and stayed, we think, in the rather siz­able Jew­ish com­mu­ni­ty there. Egypt was also part of the Roman Empire.

Stop Por­tray­ing Jesus as Home­less and Poor in Order to Pro­mote Your Pet Social Jus­tice Cause!

Yes, Jesus cared about those who were poor, and those in need, and the dis­ad­van­taged. Even so, His pri­ma­ry mis­sion was not to res­cue them from pover­tybut “to seek and to save that which was lost.” This spir­i­tu­al quest actu­al­ly is the pri­ma­ry focus of the por­tion of Isa­iah 61:1–2 Jesus read at the syn­a­gogue at Nazareth in Luke 4:16–30. Isa­iah 61:1–2 is a mes­sian­ic prophe­cy — and sig­nif­i­cant­ly, Jesus stopped read­ing just before the part about God’s vengeance. Jesus was indeed on a spir­i­tu­al quest to bring sal­va­tion to lost sin­ners. Divine vengeance and judge­ment would come, but at Jesus sec­ond com­ing — not dur­ing His first.

Jesus Film

So, I wish to say this to all social jus­tice war­riors in the church: Repent of mis­rep­re­sent­ing Jesus and His mis­sion! Stop por­tray­ing Him as home­less and poor, or as a refugee, to pro­mote your pet social jus­tice cause.

You’re not just pro­mot­ing the social jus­tice nar­ra­tive; you’re also pro­mot­ing a coun­ter­feit gospel.

B. Nathaniel Sullivan

B. Nathaniel Sullivan is a Bible teacher and writer. He writes about cultural events from a biblical perspective and posts his insights at https://www.wordfoundations.com. He's also written Bible studies that are available at https://www.discoverbedrocktruth.org.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Check Also
Close
Back to top button